| Subscribe via RSS

Henry Blodget 2.0!

October 3rd, 2007 Posted in Google

Hey, you hear Google shares are heading to $2000? Yup, just a matter of time before the search monster has a market capitalization of a staggering $750-billion - which would rank it 15th in GDP if Google was a country.

The $2000 “target” - and I use that term extremely loosely - comes from Henry Blodget, the same guy who brashly predicted Amazon would hit $400 during the dot-com boom. Kara Swisher and Michael Arrington say “ha” but they’re missing Blodget’s point, which, I think, is that online valuations these days are completely relative.

Look at the financial enthusiasm surrounding Facebook, which is rumored to have a $10-billion valuation based on $100-million or so of revenue. Who established that valuation? Some investment banker? Facebook?

Time for some back-of-the-napkin calculations. This year, Google could have have sales of about $15-billion - giving a market cap to sales ratio of 11.5. A $2000 stock price would give it a market cap to sales ratio of 50. While high, it would be HALF of what’s being thrown around in terms of Facebook’s valuation.

You can accuse Blodget of blog post-baiting, outrageousness or cheekiness but who’s to say he’s wrong?

More: To put things in perspective, Google is now trading close to $600 ($584.50 to be exact). After its $85-a-share IPO in August 2004, Google hit $100 that month. It surpassed $200 in February 2005; $300 in July 2005; $400 in November, 2005; and $500 in November 2006.

And…Good Morning Silicon Valley has a great paragraph about Blodget:

I don’t see a big problem here. There are no customers paying Blodget for trusted advice now. He’s one voice among many on the Net, all of which, investors know, should be approached on a reader-beware basis. And given all the red warning flags hanging on Blodget, nobody can claim naivete any more. If he wants to stir the pot with his exercises, fine — it makes for entertaining conversation, and you can take it for what it’s worth. But don’t automatically assume it’s worth nothing. Blodget’s record may make him a lot of things, but stupid is not one of them.

7 Responses to “Henry Blodget 2.0!”

  1. E Guy Says:

    Common sense would say he is wrong. 11X sales for Google right now. 25X sales for Facebook? 50X proposed for Google? Gimme a break. These are stupid and irrational. If you are seller, get in while the getting is good and take the “dumb” money while you can. If you are a buyer, simply review history, the South Sea Bubble, 1920s, and more recently the Dot Com era. Think about fundamentals and more than a 6 month time horizon. “Those who forgot or are ignorant of history are destined to repeat it”…


  2. Mark Evans Says:

    Question: Who pays attention to fundamentals these days?


  3. michael arrington Says:

    Answer: anyone who wants to keep their money.


  4. Mark Evans Says:

    Solide advice. Here’s hoping people are paying attention. :)


  5. Webomatica Says:

    I’d be surprised if it hit $1,000 anytime soon.


  6. Aidan Henry Says:

    Blodget is a nutball looking for attention. I have no respect for that guy. Such a target is outlandish and ridiculous. He’s simply trying to build his ‘own’ brand and widen his exposure. Little does he know, he’s eroding his credibility in the process (if indeed he has any left)…

    -Aidan
    http://www.MappingTheWeb.com


  7. craig Says:

    If the google doubleclick deal gets approved, google will hit $1000 quickly and $2000 within two years.


Leave a Reply




  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Technology